What Every Latter-Day Saint Should Know About Vaccines

Reposted from The Latter Day Conservative

Guest post by Samuel Smith

coronavirus vaccine

As drug manufacturers rush to create a vaccine for COVID-19, one question is sure to be on the minds of many members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints: “What is the Church’s position on vaccines?” Of course, many will point to the 1978 statement from the First Presidency wherein they stated: “We urge members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to protect their own children through immunization… Failure to act could subject untold thousands to preventable lifelong physical or mental impairment, including paralysis, blindness, deafness, heart damage and mental retardation.” Others will bring up the fact that since 2012, mass vaccination campaigns have been officially part of the Church’s humanitarian initiatives. Because of these facts, this is where the issue ends for many people. However, the questions most worthy of our consideration are these: What is God’s position on vaccines? Does He care? Is He in favor? Does He oppose? How can we know?

The answers to these questions, as I will argue, are yes, He does care and does have a position. The way that we can know is not only through “personal revelation”–for there is a chance we could be deceived by only relying upon such alone–but also through an appeal to the scriptures and prophetic teachings on the treatment of our bodies. So, let us examine some of these things.

Truth Should Be Confirmed By Scripture

First, we would do well to establish the fact that each of us is responsible for our own salvation and the path we chart. If we don’t know the doctrine found in the scriptures that lead the way to life and salvation, that is no fault of any leader–it is our own. Indeed, Church authorities have stressed time and again, that we each have the responsibility to discern truth for ourselves, by appealing to the scriptures. For example, Joseph Fielding Smith once proclaimed:

“It makes no difference what is written or what anyone has said, if what has been said is in conflict with what the Lord has revealed, we can set it aside. My words, and the teaching of any other member of the Church, high or low, if they do not square with the revelations, we need not accept them. Let us have this matter clear. We have accepted the four standard works as the measuring yardsticks, or balances, by which we measure every man’s doctrine. You cannot accept the books written by the authorities of the Church as standards in doctrine, only in so far as they accord with the revealed word in the standard works. If Joseph Fielding Smith writes something which is out of harmony with the revelations, then every member of the Church is duty bound to reject it. If he writes that which is in perfect harmony with the revealed word of the Lord, then it should be accepted” (Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, vol. 3, p. 203).

President Harold B. Lee taught this principle frequently as well. On one occasion, he affirmed:

The scriptures are the standard by which to measure truth. All that we teach in this church ought to be couched in the scriptures. We ought to choose our texts from the scriptures, and wherever you have an illustration in the scriptures or a revelation in the Book of Mormon, use it, and do not draw from other sources where you can find it here in these books. We call these the standard Church works because they are standard. If you want to measure truth, measure it by the four standard Church works. If it is not in the standard works, you may well assume that it is speculation. It is man’s own personal opinion, to put it another way; and if it contradicts what is in the scriptures, you may know by that same token that it is not true. This is the standard by which you measure all truth. But if you do not know the standards, you have no adequate measure of truth” (Harold B. Lee, The Teachings of Harold B. Lee, 149).

With this idea in mind, who can point to the scriptural justification or rationale for vaccines? I have yet to find anything sufficiently and comprehensively convincing. On the contrary, as I will show, the justification for vaccines appears to rely more on the arm of flesh rather than on God. The scriptures repeatedly teach us to rely on God and His wisdom and not on the arm of flesh. In the Book of Mormon, Jacob proclaims:

“O that cunning plan of the evil one! O the vainness, and the frailties, and the foolishness of men! When they are learned they think they are wise, and they hearken not unto the counsel of God, for they set it aside, supposing they know of themselves, wherefore, their wisdom is foolishness and it profiteth them not. And they shall perish” (2 Nephi 9:28).

In 2 Nephi 28, Nephi teaches us that “cursed is he that putteth his trust in man, or maketh flesh his arm, or shall hearken unto the precepts of men, save their precepts shall be given by the power of the Holy Ghost” (2 Nephi 28:31). In the Old Testament, Jeremiah proclaimed: “Thus saith the Lord; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the Lord” (Jeremiah 17:5). Furthermore, again and again in scripture we are commanded to “live by every word which proceedeth forth out of the mouth of God” (Deuteronomy 8:3; Matthew 4:4; D&C 84:44; D&C 98:11).

Clearly, if we want to establish the truth of any teaching or any principle, it must be rooted in the scriptures, relying upon the Lord and His wisdom and not on the wisdom of man.

Read More here:


Life with Autism in Pictures: When the Silence Screams

A hard blog to write…
“When the Silence Screams”
Shared at great risk — because of the haters and those who want our kids to just go away who are looking at any excuse or reason to call CPS/APS on us for “exploiting” our kids.
But I had to share this blog.
The world needs to HEAR this blog.
Brandon’s pain.
Pharma-funded and controlled legislators are not hearing our voices with regard to vaccine fraud & corruption and our parental right to refuse a liability-free medical procedure.
Maybe they’ll hear his.
I am exploiting not my son – but what has happened to him.
So that this holocaust against our children can be stopped!
Because if our right to refuse isn’t upheld, our children’s stolen dreams will be piled higher than rotting shoes at a holocaust museum.
That was government mandated with no ability to refuse, too.
Just like vaccination is fast becoming.

* * * 

Read more here:


CDC Concedes … Quietly. Has The American Academy of Pediatrics Been Told? — lifebiomedguru


As of 2/2018 … quietly, CDC has conceded important facts about the MMR and MMRV Vaccines. Please forward this article to all MDs who need to know that, according to the CDC. The information below is directly from the CDC: MMRV https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/vis/vis-statements/mmrv.html Some people should not get this vaccine Tell your vaccine provider if the […]

via CDC Concedes … Quietly. Has The American Academy of Pediatrics Been Told? — lifebiomedguru

Why Did the FDA Just Ignore Safety Signals on HPV Vaccine in Women Aged 26 to 45?


Last Friday, the FDA approved of HPV vaccination of older women – at the end of a week in which a blockbuster book came out that highlights serious issues with the HPV vaccine – including troubling safety signals that the FDA knows about.

Previously, the vaccine had been approved for use ages 9-26, although scant data exists on the efficacy and safety in 9-year olds.  The FDA extended the approved use into an age group (27 to 45 years old women), some of whom will now almost certainly feel the effects of FDA’s latest flawed approval by experiencing autoimmunity, paralysis and death.

What the FDA Knows We Now Know, Too

From the information submitted from Merck to the US FDA, it is apparent that the vaccine used in Protocol 018, the only study of the safety of the vaccine market group  (9-15 year-olds) used only one-half the standard AAHS dose…

View original post 502 more words

John Oliver, you unfunny schmuck @iamjohnoliver

What is it with comedians/talk show hosts thinking that they have the right to belittle vaccine injured parents?

Levi Quackenboss

Oh, John. I don’t even know how to begin this conversation.

Screen Shot 2017-06-26 at 3.25.22 PM {RFK Jr. said he’s spent years trying to get mercury out of fish without anyone ever accusing him of being anti-fish. Here is John explaining how stupid fish are.}

I have friends who think you’re brilliant. I’ve only seen one of your monologues since you’ve been on the air, and I don’t have HBO, so I didn’t have an opinion of you before yesterday.  And now I feel compelled to warn you that something’s not computing in your brain. I hope you take heed.

So you went on your show yesterday to attack people who either stop vaccinating their children or never vaccinated in the first place. It was a 27-minute angry, condescending, sometimes-loony but never-funny rant.

Someday, John, you’re going to realize that it is not acceptable to attack the parents of children killed or disabled by vaccines…

View original post 1,795 more words